City Council Minutes 1992 05 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

survey and the survey results have come out negative. We were either asked not to testify at the Hearing or the license application was withdrawn entirely. This happened with Conoco in Jefferson County, and 3$th and Federal when we were doing a block of licenses for Vickers Total Petroleum, and some other applications. It's usually an off- premise type of license. I have had an article published in the Colorado Lawyer. I have taught three 3 hour blocks of Continuing Legal Education Seminars. The materials that you see here today have been three times approved by the Colorado Supreme Court for CLE purposes. Our surveys have been the topic of numerous 106 actions where generally the Courts have held that the survey was proper, the screening procedures were done in accordance with the statute, and that the results were reliable on the sense that it was a scientific survey. I would like to tender a report (see attached) to the Authority and answer any questions that people might have. The report before you is the summary of the questions that we typically get asked when we do a survey. I would like for you to think of this as an "opinion poll" survey. If we could speak to 100% of the people, these results would only vary only 2% to 3%. In this particular survey we got a substantial sampling, because the applicant was interested in doing a large sampling. The fee that we charge the applicant is based on the total number of doors that we knock on and not the results of the survey, since we cannot always predict those. Scott explained the survey and the results to the Authority and audience. (Tape available.) Howard: It's your contention that, because of the traffic pattern, this site would not substantially interfere 22