Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer: <br /> <br />is provision and specific exhibits <br />for performance guarantee. There <br />are also clauses in the standard <br />Subdivision Agreement regarding <br />completion requirements, dates for <br />completion of certain Phases, and <br />penalty provisions cited in the <br />standard Subdivision Agreement. <br />Before the Developer can proceed <br />with the development of the <br />property, that Agreement must be <br />completed, executed, and approved. <br /> <br />It seems to me that the Coal Creek <br />Trail is more of an after thought <br />than something that is integrated <br />into the project. Has anyone <br />considered a safer way of doing the <br />Trail? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />I was working with Boulder County, <br />Louisville, and Lafayette on the <br />trail concept. I recall that the <br />City was in the process of looking <br />at the Golf Course Annexation and <br />development. They had considered <br />with the County initially a route <br />that went up by the creek. As the <br />Golf Course concept matured and <br />gained detail there was a growing <br />concern about golf balls, <br />liability, folk coming by the Golf <br />Course, through the Golf Course, and <br />golfers interacting with the general <br />public in an semi-uncontrolled <br />setting. That apparently generated <br />the development plan which rerouted <br />the alignment away from the Golf <br />Course. One alignment was the gas <br />line. I wasn't with the City at <br />that time, but the City was working <br />on both the Golf Course and the <br />trail concept and they were very <br />concerned about golf balls hitting <br />people, etc. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I have a concern about cars hitting <br />people and some of the street <br />standards here. In going to Coal <br />Creek to look at another issue <br />having to do with the sale of Open <br />Space, I observed several problems <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />