Laserfiche WebLink
for substandard streets. I saw a <br />woman pushing a double wide baby <br />stroller down a 2 ft. sidewalk with <br />half of it in the street. I saw <br />people walking in the street, <br />because there weren't enough <br />sidewalks. <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />That received more attention than <br />any other issue I know of. There <br />was a concern about standard streets <br />on the City's part, which meant two <br />sidewalks (full width). There was a <br />concern about grade. This area <br />happens to be fairly steep. There <br />is a workable way and, thus, the <br />recommendations were based upon <br />careful study of the fact that the <br />terrain was a severe condition and <br />did require a narrower section. The <br />lot frontages were limited. Instead <br />of a limited street with lots on <br />both sides where they had driveways, <br />access, and pedestrian needs, we <br />were dealing with a situation where <br />we had lots only accessing the <br />street on one side. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />On the PUD map, at the end of St. <br />Andrews Lane it says temporary cul- <br />de-sac. <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />That's a provision for a temporary <br />turn-around access, a Fire District <br />requirement, so they can get their <br />vehicles back. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Who pays when the temporary cul-de- <br />sac is no longer "temporary"? <br /> <br />The temporary cul-de-sac, if the <br />secondary access is open in the <br />distant future after the development <br />is done, then the City would have to <br />make arrangements for pushing that <br />street through or require the next <br />developer to the east. We presume <br />we would accept that street and that <br />the development would be done and <br />then something might happen to the <br />east. The City would have the <br />maintenance responsibility unless we <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />