Laserfiche WebLink
any entity that had any foreseeable <br />economic way of connecting to this <br />pipeline, that they would <br />participate. That defines what we <br />assume to be the maximum set of <br />project participants. We re- <br />estimated the costs based upon that <br />assumption. Under that assumption <br />you'll see costs associated for <br />Louisville in two categories. For <br />an assumed delivery of 5 c.f.s. <br />through the pipeline along the <br />preliminary preferred route, the <br />estimated cost for Louisville's pro- <br />rata share in the main pipeline <br />would be almost $3.8 million. The <br />estimated cost to Louisville to <br />building this connecting pipeline <br />jointly with Lafayette, actually <br />jointly with Erie, because of the <br />way we defined the connecting <br />pipeline - it actually starts just <br />north of Erie at the point, where <br />the line to Broomfield breaks off - <br />was estimated to be about $1 million <br />for a total of about $4.7 million. <br />That's for the preliminary preferred <br />route. If Louisville and Lafayette <br />enter into these interim agreements <br />at some capacity, then the least <br />cost alternative for all of the <br />entities that possibly could be <br />involved is this westerly alignment. <br />Under that scenario, Louisville's <br />total costs would decrease by about <br />$1 million to a total of about $3.7 <br />million. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I assume Broomfield's pipeline cost <br />would remain about the same. <br /> <br />Dreher: <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Broomfield's costs would go up, if <br />we adopt this westerly alignment. <br /> <br />How could we save $1 million if our <br />connecting to the other one is less <br />than $1 million? <br /> <br />Dreher: <br /> <br />No, the total savings is $1 million. <br />It's divided almost equally. The <br />cost for your participation in the <br />Broomfield would be reduce by about <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />