City Council Minutes 1992 07 08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

education. He stated that we have debt that must be paid in a timely fashion, which is pushing the growth. He supported the Mayor in tabling this issue. Sisk was not optimistic that in 13 days any changes would be made. As far as the school issue, he felt there wouldn't be a resolution to satisfy him in 13 days either. He felt a compromise would take much longer than the 13 days suggested. He wanted to see this matter continued for a period longer than 13 days possibly into September. ' Lathrop spoke of his interest in the quality of Louisville, but felt that someone on Council should speak for the developers. He stated that we all have rights and some obligations to our community. He agreed with Mr. Sisk concerning the 13 days. The project needs a lot of work. Davidson asked the developer if he would agree to a continuance to September 1. Wall: I suppose. Davidson amended his motion to continue the Public Hearing until September 1, 1992. Seconder, Howard, accepted that. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 5-0 vote. Sisk: Since the matter is being continued, does that mean that no further publication will take place? Griffiths: No further publication required. Although, it could be re-published. would be certainly Sisk: I would like to suggest publication take place. that Mayer: Since publication in the legal notice isn't always the most widely read, perhaps in the water bills. Howard: Is that a motion? Mayer: I'll put it in the form of a motion. Howard seconded the motion. Ail in favor. ORDINANCE NO. 1073, SERIES 1992 - THE MEADOWS AT COAL CREEK - 2ND READING - PUBLIC I{EARING (PUBLISHED LOUISVILLE TIMES - 6/6, 6/13, 6/20 AND 6/27) Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1073, Series 1992, "An 17