My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 9:48:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 7, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />density being transferred between planning areas within the GDP from what was <br />approved in the original GDP and earlier GDP amendments. <br />In 2010, 12 multifamily units were moved to this property and in 2011, 17 units were <br />moved to this property. Also in 2011, the commercial square footage on this property <br />was reduced to a maximum of 65,000 s.f. The current GDP states the residential units <br />in the planning area shall not take away from the commercial development area and no <br />single family units are allowed in this area. <br />Planner Dean showed the comparison of the fiscal impact of the current proposal with <br />the original GDP from 2006, the amendments that have been approved to date, and this <br />current proposal There is still a net positive fiscal gain over 20 years. <br />This area is defined as an urban corridor in the Comprehensive Plan and calls for a mix <br />of housing to meet the needs of a variety of residents. The current proposal is still within <br />the 350 units allowed in the original 2006 GDP <br />Planner Dean reviewed the traffic and parking plans proposed for the site, stating the <br />proposal exceeds the requirements. In addition all units are below the 40 -foot height <br />limit There is a phasing plan for the PUD where each phase of residential will be built <br />with a phase of commercial It meets all landscaping and lighting requirements. Planner <br />Dean stated staff recommends approval of the Ordinance and Resolution. <br />Chad Kipfer, 5723 Arapahoe Avenue, Boulder, representing Markel Homes, reviewed <br />the history of the North End development. He stated this section under discussion is not <br />great retail space as currently configured, but the proposed changes with more visibility <br />from South Boulder Road should make this a more successful layout and should be <br />fiscally positive for the City. <br />Michael Markel, 5723 Arapahoe Avenue, Boulder, representing Markel Homes, noted <br />this is the finish line for the North End project. He stated this particular location has <br />difficulties including poor access. He stated they have done studies and market analysis <br />for the site and every study shows for commercial to be successful on this lot it would <br />require an anchored tenant in this location which is really not feasible. He noted they <br />are not asking for any additional residential density. He committed to moving the Markel <br />Homes offices from its current location in Boulder and by so doing subsidizing the <br />commercial development in this location He committed to building the commercial first <br />on this site He stated he is actively pursuing retailers for the site. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for Council questions. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if there is a way to guarantee in the GDP that these <br />commitments will happen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.