My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 9:48:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 7, 2017 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />City Attorney Light stated there is not a clear way to do this but it could possibly be <br />addressed in the subdivision agreement or GDP agreement. <br />City Attorney Light noted the phasing plan states the commercial will be built before or <br />concurrently with the residential and that would need to be reflected in the documents. <br />Mr. Markel stated his commitment is to start the commercial in the first phase prior to <br />doing the residential units in phase one, and in each additional phase. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what the current zoning of the property is. Director <br />Zuccaro state it is PCZD-C. It does not require a Special Review Use for residential <br />uses because the residential number set in the original GDP (350 units) and this does <br />not exceed it <br />Mayor Muckle asked for public comment. <br />Brian Topping, 1550 White Violet Way, stated as a resident of North End he is very <br />happy with the diversity of housing within the neighborhood He supports the request <br />and likes the plan as presented. He feels this proposal will be a benefit to the <br />neighborhood. <br />David Starnes, 1907 Lakespur Lane, stated he lives in North End and supports the <br />amendment to the GDP. He likes the vision for the development and is anxious for the <br />commercial piece. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Louisville needs more <br />diversity in housing and this offers some. The condominiums offer a great entry level <br />product. <br />RJ Harrington, 457 East Raintree Court, stated he supports the amendment and noted <br />this mixed use development shows a positive financial impact to the City. <br />City Attorney Light asked the Council by motion to formally include in the record of the <br />public hearing the following documents: all application materials submitted by the <br />applicant submitted for the GDP amendment; the final Plat, final PUD application; all <br />materials in the City Council packet consisting of the staff communication and all <br />attachments to it; the public hearing notices and proofs of publication for this hearing, all <br />written referral and public comments; presentations given this evening and all <br />documents posted as agenda related materials, the zoning ordinances as set for in the <br />Municipal Code; the Comprehensive Plan; the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan; <br />and the CDDSG. Councilmember Loo so moved, Councilmember Stolzmann seconded <br />the motion. All in favor. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for Council comments. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if there is a way to enforce Mr Markel's verbal <br />commitments. He noted there have been changes to the GDP along the way and in <br />each one the City has been looking for the commitment to the original 65,000 sf of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.