Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 7, 2017 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />City Attorney Light stated there is not a clear way to do this but it could possibly be <br />addressed in the subdivision agreement or GDP agreement. <br />City Attorney Light noted the phasing plan states the commercial will be built before or <br />concurrently with the residential and that would need to be reflected in the documents. <br />Mr. Markel stated his commitment is to start the commercial in the first phase prior to <br />doing the residential units in phase one, and in each additional phase. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what the current zoning of the property is. Director <br />Zuccaro state it is PCZD-C. It does not require a Special Review Use for residential <br />uses because the residential number set in the original GDP (350 units) and this does <br />not exceed it <br />Mayor Muckle asked for public comment. <br />Brian Topping, 1550 White Violet Way, stated as a resident of North End he is very <br />happy with the diversity of housing within the neighborhood He supports the request <br />and likes the plan as presented. He feels this proposal will be a benefit to the <br />neighborhood. <br />David Starnes, 1907 Lakespur Lane, stated he lives in North End and supports the <br />amendment to the GDP. He likes the vision for the development and is anxious for the <br />commercial piece. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Louisville needs more <br />diversity in housing and this offers some. The condominiums offer a great entry level <br />product. <br />RJ Harrington, 457 East Raintree Court, stated he supports the amendment and noted <br />this mixed use development shows a positive financial impact to the City. <br />City Attorney Light asked the Council by motion to formally include in the record of the <br />public hearing the following documents: all application materials submitted by the <br />applicant submitted for the GDP amendment; the final Plat, final PUD application; all <br />materials in the City Council packet consisting of the staff communication and all <br />attachments to it; the public hearing notices and proofs of publication for this hearing, all <br />written referral and public comments; presentations given this evening and all <br />documents posted as agenda related materials, the zoning ordinances as set for in the <br />Municipal Code; the Comprehensive Plan; the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan; <br />and the CDDSG. Councilmember Loo so moved, Councilmember Stolzmann seconded <br />the motion. All in favor. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for Council comments. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if there is a way to enforce Mr Markel's verbal <br />commitments. He noted there have been changes to the GDP along the way and in <br />each one the City has been looking for the commitment to the original 65,000 sf of <br />