Laserfiche WebLink
Sisk: <br /> <br />Braun: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Braun: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Sausage. There is no power in that <br />immediate area. We would be <br />bringing power up Taylor Avenue to <br />service both Lots 10A and 10B. <br />There is no power available on the <br />east side of Pierce, which would <br />service Lot 6. There is power on <br />the west side of that street. There <br />has already been installed stubs <br />underneath the pavement surfaces <br />that would accommodate power over to <br />those individual lots. <br /> <br />What is the position of the <br />applicant visa vie the sidewalk? <br /> <br />We're asking that you (Council) <br />approve this project as originally <br />approved by the Planning Commission, <br />which did not have a requirement for <br />sidewalks. In that discussion, we <br />felt that at a future date it would <br />be more appropriate to discuss the <br />needs and desires to have sidewalks <br />in the park. We would be willing to <br />participate in the installation of <br />sidewalks at a future date, when the <br />majority of the property along <br />Taylor Avenue has been developed and <br />there was a consistent effort to <br />install a sidewalk. We don't see a <br />need to have sidewalk going from <br />nowhere to nowhere. <br /> <br />Would you, speaking to the <br />applicant, agree that a sidewalk <br />would be constructed at the <br />applicant's expense after certain <br />conditions were met, i.e. there was <br />enough development in the <br />Technological Park to warrant that? <br /> <br />Yes, we agreed to that. We need to <br />define what "substantial <br />development" is and would want to <br />make sure that we don't get back <br />into the same scenario. <br /> <br />I understand. What <br />applicant's position <br />streetlights? <br /> <br /> is the <br />concerning <br /> <br /> <br />