My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
3/13/2017 1:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 03 14 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — LIVABLE WAGE OVERVIEW AND OPTIONS <br />DATE: MARCH 14, 2017 <br />PAGE 8 OF 12 <br />Policy Issues: <br />• If the desire is to pay wages similar to others in Boulder County, this approach <br />would support that desire. <br />• If the desire is to decrease turn -over, increase retention, and be more competitive in <br />the market, this approach would support that desire. <br />• Further discussions and decisions would need to be made regarding how, or if, to <br />provide merit increases. <br />• Additional funding sources would likely need to be identified to sustain wages at this <br />level considering the current budget. <br />Cost Estimates: <br />The cost estimate for this option would add an additional $2,485,808 to the regular <br />salaries budget and an additional $726,369 to the part-time/variable (non -benefitted) <br />salaries budget for a total of an additional $3,212,177 in salaries, and additional <br />$245,731 for FICA for an estimated grand total of $3,457,908 annually in 2018 and <br />subsequent years. <br />Recommendation for Implementation: <br />• Determine the funding source(s) to pay for this option. <br />• Based on the funding source, determine the implementation options and timing <br />or implementation. <br />Option 4: Add City of Boulder and Boulder County (who also recently implemented the <br />SSS wage standard) to our labor market cities as part of the annual salary survey and <br />salary projections. <br />Pros: <br />• By adding these communities that use livable wage, our annual market study will <br />reflect those salary ranges and incrementally adjust our wages in line with the <br />SSS. <br />• Wage impacts would affect all employee categories, assuming livable wage in <br />participating cities addresses full-time and part-time employees. <br />• Addresses compression issues. <br />• Performance remains a factor in compensation philosophy where merit increases <br />are based on performance of the individual employee. <br />• Could be easily folded into current annual salary survey process which coincides <br />with budget process. <br />Cons: <br />• Would not raise salaries to a minimum of the livable wage standard (assuming <br />$15.67) <br />• Does not address benefit eligibility below 30 hours. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.