Laserfiche WebLink
goes into debt, under the theory that lease-purchases weren't <br />really a debt obligation, that the City could back out of it at any <br />time. You legally can back out, but the credit bureaus all <br />remember you did. Debt is something that requires voter approval. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1081, Series 1992, <br />an ordinance prohibiting financing of real or personal property for <br />governmental or proprietary purposes through lease-purchase or <br />long-term lease agreements and set Public Hearing for September 1, <br />1992. Seconded by Hornbostel. Roll call was taken. Motion passed <br />by a 7-0 vote. <br /> <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION AND PUD SECTION OF PUD CODE <br /> <br />Mayer stated that using the Subdivision Code itself is not the best <br />way to bring in large significant developments. There are very few <br />controls that the City has on such developments. He recommended <br />that the City amend the Subdivision Ordinance such that any <br />subdivision with more than five housing units shall be required to <br />submit a PUD plan and be subject to the sections in the PUD <br />Ordinance to ensure that the large housing subdivisions that come <br />into the City will be of high quality. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Are we allowed to do that? <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that she saw Mayer's <br />proposal just the day before and had not been able to go over all <br />of the legal issues related to it. She'll go over the issues and <br />get a response to the Council along with a draft of the ordinance, <br />if Council would like. The one concern she has is to ensure that <br />the requirement complies with the PUD State Statute, which sets out <br />a series of requirements that apply to the PUD process. One is <br />that all of the development in a City cannot be required to go <br />through a PUD process. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Tom (Mayer), the intent for the five <br />units or less, if Susan, in her <br />reviewing it, found out it needed to <br />be 20 or 25 units or less, that <br />still meets your basic intent? <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Certainly. A full PUD review might <br />be an onerous burden on the very <br />small developer. For any <br />development that is going to have a <br />significant impact on the City, it <br />would be worthwhile to protect the <br />City's interest. One could adopt <br />many of the PUD proposals in the <br />Subdivision Ordinance, but it's more <br />straight forward to just adopt the <br />PUD procedures in total. <br /> <br /> <br />