Laserfiche WebLink
Griffiths: <br /> <br />Right now the PUD Ordinance requires <br />all Residential zoned districts to <br />be under this PUD process, if they <br />are 40 acres or more. I'm assuming <br />that what you would like to do is to <br />reduce that 40 acres or more down to <br />a smaller number. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />It might have to be done both in <br />terms of land or density. I'll rely <br />on you to determine that. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />I understand the policy that you're <br />trying to address. If Council would <br />like to have a draft prepared along <br />those lines, I'll look at the <br />Statutes and Ordinances and discuss <br />it further with Councilman Mayer and <br />come back with an ordinance that <br />would reflect those concerns. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Is the intent of this to apply to <br />areas currently annexed to the City, <br />but don't have an approve plat? <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />It would apply to anything that <br />hadn't been formally platted. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments or questions. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />I'm having difficulty justifying the <br />comments made by Councilman Mayer as <br />far as what the purpose and the end <br />result would be in adopting such a <br />change. I'm not sure of the intent <br />here. The burden that you would <br />transfer to a small or medium sized <br />developer on a properly zoned parcel <br />of land in Louisville is not <br />warranted. We would just be adding <br />the expenses of the PUD filing, <br />separate drawings, extra consultants <br />to do work that really doesn't <br />justify the need. To make someone <br />go through a PUD gyration, when it <br />isn't warranted, I have difficulty <br />with. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I disagree with Rob. In looking <br />through the case law that Susan <br />submitted to us, I found that those <br />findings in the subdivision process <br /> <br /> <br />