My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 03 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 03 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
3/22/2017 12:21:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 03 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 7, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />Bernard Funk, 1104 Hillside Lane, asked if there were still any plan for residential west <br />of McCaslin Boulevard on Centennial Parkway. If yes, he would like neighbors to be <br />involved in design guidelines to help protect the properties surrounding new <br />development. He expressed concem about school overcrowding. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the new residential west of McCaslin Boulevard has been <br />removed from the Plan. Councilmember Loo clarified the area on Centennial Parkway is <br />zoned for commercial. She asked Mr. Funk if he would prefer residential or commercial <br />in that area. Mr. Funk stated he is supportive of commercial in that area, but if we are <br />entertaining anything else he would like some input. <br />Curtis Paxton, 383 Meeker Court, asked the Plan clearly state there be a maximum <br />height of two-story buildings in the area east of McCaslin Boulevard. Director Zuccaro <br />confirmed that is what is in the Plan. <br />Ronald Heffner, 1132 Hillside Lane, stated his concerns are maintaining the value of his <br />home, the severity of the traffic on McCaslin Boulevard, not having residential in the <br />area southwest of his home. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />Mayor Muckle thanked everyone who has been engaged in this process through many <br />versions and changes. He supports the Plan as presented tonight. He understand the <br />concerns of Koelbel and Company and feels those can be addressed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked about the pedestrian signal on McCaslin Boulevard and <br />how long it will stop traffic to allow a pedestrian to cross six lanes. Director Zuccaro <br />stated he did not have a time estimate. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated his concern is how <br />long it will hold up traffic particularly at rush hour. <br />Councilmember Maloney also thanked staff for their work. He appreciates the additional <br />TOD language in the Plan. He added he would also like to see the pedestrian signal <br />removed. He agrees with Mr. Sheets that the illustrations can feel prescriptive to <br />developers and should be considered. He supports approving the Plan tonight. <br />Mayor Muckle noted the signal could be addressed in the budgeting process and he <br />prefers to leave it to make a statement about the importance of walkability in the area. <br />Councilmember Keany noted there are no trail connections near that pedestrian signal <br />so he feels it can be removed from the Plan without great impact. He supports the Plan <br />as presented tonight. He hoped there will be ways to address Mr. Sheets' concems <br />through the design guideline update. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.