City Council Minutes 1992 09 01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Paul Martus, 639 Coal Creek Lane (sign-up card stated address as 936 Fairfield Lane), Louisville, CO, seconded Frontczak's concerns about moving the bike path. He was also concerned about if the developer stripped all three (3) phases, how the developer would control the dust on windy days. Lynne Avery, 741 W. Mulberry Street, Louisville, CO, spoke of her concern about what assurance they have from the developer that this new development will not proceed on an accelerated schedule. She was also concerned about the overcrowding of the schools. Ed Miccio, 786 W. Fir Court, Louisville, CO, wondered if, in terms of revenue, the annexation is in the best interest of the City of Louisville. He also had concerns about the overcrowding of the schools. Paul Darby, 102 Vista Lane, Louisville, CO, had concerns about the overcrowding of the schools and the growth of Louisville in general. Debra E. Whitehead, 369 S. Taft Court, Louisville, CO, Council to wait until the Comprehensive Plan was completed. she was concerned about the school overcrowding. asked Also, Don Iverson, 799 W. Dahlia Street, Louisville, CO, was concerned about the overcrowding of the schools and having open space, with as little growth as possible. Linda Bolmer, 560 Manorwood Lane, Louisville, CO, was concerned about the park being located at the end of the driving range. She felt that was dangerous. The overcrowding of the schools was also a concern of hers. Davidson called for anyone else who wished to speak on Resolution No. 38. NONE Davidson closed the Public Hearing. Davidson called for Council comments and questions. Mayer: I am going to support this development. If we waited for the Comp Plan, south Louisville is one of last areas to be considered and probably wouldn't be considered for another three (3) years. As far as the schools, one of the novel things about this plan is the phasing of it at a reasonably moderate rate. This is a legally binding document. They 5