My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 10 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 10 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 8:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/6/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 10 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
been used as open space by Louisville residents. He stated that <br />they checked with the City on their plans on parks and acquisition <br />of open space and this was not part of their plan. Since 1977, it <br />had been shown as residential with zoning approved for a minimum of <br />12,000 sq. ft. lots. Sheffield stated that they then contacted <br />Swede Johnson, who has legal emphasis on land use, to review the <br />property for us. Johnson felt strongly that due to the following <br />events, the property could legally be developed, if it met the <br />legal and City guidelines: The annexation agreement, which in <br />1977, created a contract between the City and the developer. It <br />called for the developer to do the following; dedicate to the City <br />a minimum of 12% of the land, give valuable water rights to the <br />City, pay over $5,000.00 in fees for annexation and zoning, and <br />oversize the utility lines in anticipation of construction. He <br />stated that these requirements have been completed and the City <br />agreed to approve home sites, if the property guidelines. They <br />felt they could rely on this agreement and decided to pursue this <br />residential area for homesites. They believed that they could rely <br />on the City's zoning ordinance and that the City had shown on the <br />comprehensive plan that homes could be built. So, they proceeded <br />to complete the paperwork and all of the information that has <br />resulted in the plat before Council tonight. The density of the <br />homesites is approximately 2.7 dwelling units per acre for the 68 <br />sites. The lot sizes average over 14,000 sq. ft. or approximately <br />1/3 acre. Voluntarily, Sheffield and Mr. Pitcher went door to door <br />and talked to several of the neighbors that were directly affected. <br />They participated in the neighborhood meeting at the elementary <br />school. They arranged the lots to mitigate the effect on existing <br />homeowners, trying to get proper set-backs, so that there would not <br />be homes back to back. There is approximately one (1) Sheffield <br />home for every two (2) of those in the existing community on the <br />plat. They lowered the density by what could have been done by <br />over 20%, which is about 6 - 7 homesites, to allow for a better <br />contour in the use of the ground, so it would look better from <br />South Boulder Road, it would appeal to the neighboring home owners, <br />and it would allow the streets to flow better for drainage and <br />other infrastructure purposes. He stated that off of the top of <br />the hill the grading will be reduced approximately 20 ft., so that <br />the homeowners to the west will not feel the massing effects of <br />homes right in their backyard. In addition, they've tried to <br />lengthen the lot lines to mitigate that effect. The lots are deep <br />enough, some of them 150 ft., which the higher homes will not be <br />looking down into neighbors backyards, or decks, or patios. He <br />stated that they've tried to site the homes, so that the upper will <br />not affect the lower. The sizes of the homes that they anticipate <br />building will not overwhelm the neighbors by looking like wall to <br />wall houses. He commented that they met with the Planning <br />Commission in three (3) comprehensive meetings making changes and <br />compromises in trying to address the concerns of the Commission, <br />the citizens, and adjacent homeowners. He stated that they've <br />agreed to the conditions (SEE ATTACHED), as set forth by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.