My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 10 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 10 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 8:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/6/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 10 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Howard: <br /> <br />would allow two (2) lots. <br /> <br />I'm getting two (2) signals from <br />you, Mr. Beaton. The first signal <br />is that you're really only <br />interested in providing for your own <br />wherewithal. The second signal is <br />that you're interested in having two <br />(2) lots and have had discussions <br />with the adjacent property owner to <br />help ensure that you're going to <br />have two (2) lots. If the true <br />intent is to tie together these two <br />(2) lots into a larger subdivision <br />that could perhaps carry through <br />from the RE to the north of your <br />property and, perhaps, the property <br />to the south of you. That's a <br />little different from your original <br />assertion.. What is it that you <br />really want? <br /> <br />Beaton: <br /> <br />We've got this small parcel, which <br />is critical to the development of <br />that area. We plan to build one (1) <br />house there and it appears that RE <br />zoning is appropriate. Therefore, <br />if there is enough square footage <br />after working out the easement issue <br />to allow us two (2) lots, we would <br />like to go ahead and get zoned for <br />two (2) lots. We would agree to <br />only build one (1) house within <br />three (3) or four (4) years, because <br />of school crowding issues or <br />whatever. In order to get access to <br />the property to the north, which is <br />within the'City, we have to address <br />the road ~ . We' <br /> · ssue re trying to <br />work out something that is not <br />"piece meal", which allows us to <br />proceed with RE zoning for this <br />property and addresses road, water, <br />sewer, and whatever else would be <br />necessary to develop our parcel. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />How many acres are in the Boulder <br />County parcel? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />I think it is 30 acres. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />So, in an RE zoning and 30 acres, <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.