Laserfiche WebLink
Franklin: <br /> <br />we're looking at 90 houses. <br /> <br />Up to, in a full capacity scenario. <br />There will be some park land and <br />other things that will take away <br />from that. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />When we put all of these <br />improvements in, you know they're <br />going to develop the rest of the <br />parcel/enclave, which means 90 <br />houses. That has a real impact on <br />the schools. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />John, what is the minimum lot size <br />under RR? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Under RR you can have 20,000 sq. ft. <br />lots and the RRR is five (5) acres <br />or whatever the parcel size is that <br />you end up with. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />If we took the majority of the <br />Walnut Street right-of-way out of <br />your property, that would leave you <br />a little bit over 20,000 sq. ft., <br />which would allow you to build your <br />home on the remaining parcel under <br />an RR zoning. Would that be an <br />acceptable thing to you, not knowing <br />if you could put something together <br />with the adjoining property owner? <br />I thought your intent was to build a <br />house. <br /> <br />Beaton: <br /> <br />The discussions that we've had with <br />the property owner to the north is <br />that he is willing to swing the road <br />his direction, so that we have in <br />excess of 24,000 sq. ft. under an RE <br />zoning. It is our intent to build <br />one house on that parcel. Since the <br />zoning to the north is RE, the <br />zoning to the east is RL, we asked <br />for RE zoning. If the Council is <br />concerned that it opens up a <br />Pandora's box and they're only <br />willing to give up RR zoning, I <br />guess we'll build one house there. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />My recommendation would be to go <br />with RR to the Planning Commission, <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />