My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 04 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 04 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
5/3/2017 9:26:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 04 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 18, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he conceptually supports wayfinding, but agrees the <br />proposed design for entryways are not readable and not in great locations. Mockups <br />would be helpful for the gateway signs. <br />Councilmember Keany agreed that monument gateway signs should be prioritized. He <br />likes the directional signs. He supports option four as presented. He would like to see <br />mockups of the gateway signs to see how they look. He agreed it makes sense to look <br />at the budget to see where carryover priorities are before funding this project. <br />Mayor Muckle stated his support for option four and is ready to spend the money on <br />getting this done. He likes the mockup idea to see what works best. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed with Mayor Muckle and Councilmember Keany. He noted <br />designing signs by committee is a no win situation. He stated there is general <br />consensus for the signs. It is imperfect but we should move forward. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to approve phase one, option four and approve monument signs <br />to be installed once the mockups are done and there is consensus they are readable. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton seconded. <br />Councilmember Loo stated that before we spend money on this we should compare this <br />to other budget priorities for the carryforward money. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he can support option four. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she can't support this project until all of the <br />carryforward funds are discussed as a group and projects prioritized. <br />Roll call vote: motion failed 3-3. Yes: Council Member Maloney, Mayor Muckle, Mayor <br />Pro Tem Lipton; No: Council Member Stolzmann, Council Member Loo, Council <br />Member Keany.; Absent: Council Member Leh. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved to give staff direction to make mockups of monument <br />signs and continue the item until after carryforward funds have been discussed. Mayor <br />Pro Tem Lipton seconded. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he won't support spending staff time on the mockups until we are <br />sure we are going to commit to funding this. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted the carryforward discussion will be May 16; so <br />wayfinding can be brought back for discussion on June 6. <br />Roll call vote: Motion passed 5-1. Yes: Council Member Maloney, Council Member <br />Keany, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton, Council Member Loo, Council Member Stolzmann; No: <br />Mayor Muckle, Absent: Council Member Leh. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.