My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 11 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 11 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 8:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
11/4/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 11 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Griffiths: <br /> <br />Davis: <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />Davis: <br /> <br />that we have, because we can't <br />control the future. Our attorney <br />has been in touch with Susan. We <br />would be amenable to passing this <br />and then working with a stipulation <br />that we work out the exact language <br />in the phasing in the next few days. <br />Or, we could eliminate the phasing <br />language and have a specific phasing <br />schedule only. <br /> <br />I received some revised language <br />from the developers attorney on the <br />phasing provision. If you believe <br />that there should be a provision <br />allowing escalation or de-escalation <br />based upon the number of children <br />residing there, then we would need <br />some time to work out the specifics <br />of the language in conjunction with <br />the Planning Department before you <br />tie it into this language. <br /> <br />I'm sure we can work it out. Out of <br />31 reservations to date, we have two <br />children so far. <br /> <br />If there is a way that we can <br />clearly say that this is a <br />mechanism, it's non-invasive, and <br />can give us an idea about what the <br />real impact to date is, I might be <br />willing to go for that. I'm not <br />willing to go for some mechanism <br />that's going to be invasive or put <br />an undue burden on both City Staff <br />and the development community. <br /> <br />In my opinion, I believe that we're <br />looking at year around schools right <br />now. It's not my intention to wrap <br />you up in "red tape". <br /> <br />To clarify that, the way that we <br />have proposed it is that elementary <br />and middle school, one child per <br />three units built. If it's less <br />than that on a quarterly basis, we <br />accelerate it. If it's more than <br />that, we would de-celerate it. We <br />would ask that it be in yearly <br />average, because it's impossible to <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.