My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 11 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 11 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 8:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
11/4/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 11 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the recommendations and the thinking <br />as expressed by the Planning <br />Commission, the intent of the <br />Planning Commission? <br /> <br />Russ VanNostrand, Planning Commission, stated that there hasn't <br />been a tremendous amount of change between what was done at the <br />final PUD for the Planning Commission and what Council is now <br />looking at. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />On note "K" on the phasing, due to <br />the fact that amendment No. 6 didn't <br />pass last night and there have been <br />statements made by the School <br />District that they didn't plan to go <br />to go for a Bond Issue, if Amendment <br />No. 6 didn't pass. "K" provides for <br />an escalation in the phasing <br />schedule. I wondered if there is <br />any way we could work out a de- <br />escalation, if something happened, <br />where it took them longer to take <br />care of the problem that we have in <br />Louisville? The kids from this <br />subdivision are going to be going to <br />Fireside and as of next year it will <br />be over 100+ students over its <br />capacity. You're telling us that <br />it's going to be adult oriented and <br />there aren't going to be any kids. <br />If there were not going to be any <br />kids, it would be fine for you to <br />escalate. I would also like to see <br />a de-escalation, if it turns out <br />that there are more children found <br />to be in these apartments. <br /> <br />Doug Davis, one of the developers, stated that that would be fine <br />with them. He commented that they have taken into consideration <br />the statistics from both Douglas County and Boulder County in <br />reaching the one out of three figure and they feel comfortable with <br />that. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />I was going to propose that there <br />would be a de-escalation, if you <br />ended up with one student per <br />apartment complex. <br /> <br />Davis: <br /> <br />The problem that we're having with <br />the phasing schedule is that we have <br />to measure it, when the units are <br />sold. That's the only accurate way <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.