City Council Minutes 1992 11 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

would be no way that I would deny that reasonable access by vacating that easement. But, there is reasonable access right down the street and that access has far greater utility for the general population of Louisville. Moreover, it's already constructed. It ties into our park system. It's across the street from the Harper Lake area and connects up with the trail. I felt that the citizens of Louisville's general interest was maintained with the access to the north. Sisk: I'm going to vote against the ordinance. I have a concern about the wording of the ordinance in terms of the legality of that where we suggest that even if it's approved, that half of the easement is located on Lot 25 and the other half is on Lot 26. So we know that to be true by way of a survey or are we assuming that to be true? Griffiths: I will verify that prior to 2nd Reading and report back to the Council. Hornbostel: When this came up a couple of weeks ago I planned to say "NO", because I felt like that the number of people that came in that wanted the easement vacated were all of the people that were backed up to the open space. I felt like we had an obligation to the rest of the people that lived in that subdivision. I'll be voting "NO" again. Howard moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1089, Series 1992 at 1st Reading and set Public Hearing for November 17, 1992. Seconded by Hedding. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 4-3 vote with Lathrop, Sisk, and Hornbostel voting against. RESOLUTION NO. 65, SERIES 1992 - FINAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT OF PA~'/(WOOD SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1, TRACT D, COTTONWOOD VILLAS Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the applicant, Randy Currier, is requesting an approval of a final replat for Parkwood 6