Laserfiche WebLink
in the '93 Budget, we had $2.568 <br />million for the South Pipeline <br />Project, $1.7 million for water <br />right purchase, plus expenditures <br />for the South Treatment Plant. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />These reserves, they are inflexible <br />in the sense that if the pipeline <br />isn't available for next year, we <br />can't spend it on raw water <br />purchases somewhere else? <br /> <br />Asti-Caranci: <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />According to Kim Higgins our City <br />Auditor, we could reserve the money <br />for a specific purpose, but if <br />that's not where you ended up, you <br />could change that purpose. <br /> <br />Amendment 1 does expressly mention <br />reserve transfers, so it <br />contemplates moving money among <br />reserve accounts. <br /> <br />Annette: <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />I think that takes us through No. 3, <br />4 & 5 (on the Agenda), doesn't it? <br /> <br />We up to No. 6. <br /> <br />UPDATE ON IMPACT OF AMENDMENT 1 <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that she didn't have any <br />additional update other than what she stated before, other than <br />with respect to the interrogatories, which will clarify certain <br />aspects of Amendment No. 1. It is her understanding that CML has <br />presented six proposed interrogatories to the Governor, the School <br />Districts have provided at least three, the Special Districts have <br />provided at least three, and the Governor has some issues of <br />particular concern to him. But, she not certain that the Governor <br />is going to submit any of the questions to the Supreme Court. If <br />he does submit any of them, she doesn't know which ones he might <br />submit, or if he'll just have his own. She stated that the <br />specific interrogatories, outside of the enterprise issue, probably <br />do not resolve some of the issues that have already been discussed <br />at tonight's meeting. She stated that they couldn't look to the <br />interrogatories to solve all of the issues for Louisville, although <br />they may be of some assistance, if they go to the Supreme Court and <br />if the Supreme Court decides to answer any of them. <br /> <br />Annette Brand, City Administrator, asked Council to consider the <br />number of Building Permits, as to whether Council wants to stay <br />with 250. At on time Davidson thought it might be more like 350. <br />Did he want them to go back and try to be very precise as far as <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />