My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
5/17/2017 10:51:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 2, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />asked a subcommittee of Councilmember Maloney and Councilmember Loo be <br />appointed to work with staff <br />Councilmember Loo asked what the timing of this looks like. She agreed with <br />Councilmember Maloney it would be best to move concurrently as much as possible. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the organizational assessment should be first and when we have <br />that then we can work on the search committee Request for Proposal (RFP) for the <br />executive search firm. He stated he would like to be on the subcommittee for hiring the <br />city manager. <br />Attorney Light stated the Council can create a new committee with a defined job <br />description. He noted State Law requires some things will need to be done in open <br />meetings, but when the time comes, State Law does allow executive session for the <br />committee to do certain things such as review of non -finalist applications If Council <br />wants a committee, staff will need direction on what is wanted from the committee. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like to see the Committee be a working group with the <br />product coming back to Council for final direction. He agrees a search firm is necessary. <br />He would like to define what the organizational assessment will entail so we are better <br />informed with the process. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he would like to serve on the working group as well. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like to see the RFP go out as soon as possible. It is a <br />separate issue from the organizational review. She would like the subcommittee <br />appointed soon to get the ball rolling for the search firm and keep the schedule moving. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved to give direction to staff to issue an RFP for an <br />executive search firm to recruit a city manager, Councilmember Loo seconded the <br />motion. <br />Councilmember Leh stated Council needs to be involved in the creation of the RFP and <br />the search firm should not be the ones creating the job description. He stated the <br />organizational assessment needs to be done separately from the search firm <br />Councilmember Stolzmann amended her motion to ask staff to bring back an RFP for <br />Council to review <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated there needs to be time spent and some public process to <br />identify critical success factors which come out of the organization assessment. There <br />needs to be buy in and agreement what we are searching for notwithstanding the job <br />description. He is willing to be patient on this to make sure we know what we want. He <br />supports a subcommittee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.