My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
5/17/2017 10:51:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 2, 2017 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we should move quickly and work on both the <br />organizational assessment and the recruitment concurrently and be ready to do the <br />recruitment when the assessment is done. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton suggested a couple of councilmembers work with staff on the <br />RFP and draft scope of work for the RFP. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if the committee <br />could also work on a proposed work plan for the entire process and schedule. He <br />offered this as a friendly amendment to the motion Councilmember Stolzmann rejected <br />the friendly amendment. <br />Councilmember Loo stated the whole Council should get together to define what they <br />want in the organizational study <br />Mayor Muckle stated he would like the Council to determine key characteristics of what <br />they are looking for separately from the search firm <br />Councilmember Keany asked Director Hix her opinion She agreed a search firm is <br />needed for a variety of reasons. She stated an RFP can be done quickly for an <br />executive search firm, but other firms specialize in doing the organizational <br />assessments and she would recommend that approach. <br />Director Hix stated she could bnng a back a menu of items of what could be included in <br />an organizational assessment. That could be done for the May 16 meeting. <br />Councilmember Leh moved to direct staff to put together a menu of options for an <br />organizational assessment separate from the RFP development. Mayor Muckle <br />seconded After discussion, Councilmember Leh withdrew his motion. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann reiterated her motion to direct staff to bring back a draft RFP <br />for Council consideration Mayor Pro Tem Lipton offered a friendly amendment for the <br />Mayor to appoint two Council members to work with staff on developing a draft work <br />plan and draft schedule for the search and organizational assessment to come back to <br />Council for consideration. Councilmember Stolzmann accepted if the City Attorney did <br />not need additional legal language City Attorney Light confirmed there was no <br />additional language needed <br />MOTION. Councilmember Stolzmann moved to direct HR to prepare a draft RFP for a <br />recruiter search firm and that the Mayor appoint two councilmembers to work with HR <br />on a draft work plan and work schedule for a search; Councilmember Loo seconded. All <br />in favor. <br />MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to direct HR to prepare for Council a menu of possible <br />actions Council could take as a part of an organizational review; Councilmember Keany <br />seconded. All in favor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.