Laserfiche WebLink
has children of school age, and will <br />do whatever is within the arm of the <br />law to try and mitigate the school <br />issue. This was the first Council <br />to invite the School District in to <br />find out what can be done. The <br />developer has gone out of their way <br />to work with the citizens and with <br />the Council. This particular <br />proposal gets us the closest I've <br />seen to both ensuring that the City <br />gets what it needs and that we can <br />retain something on this site. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Mr. Sheffield to go over the proposed phasing again. <br /> <br />Sheffield reviewed the phasing and stated that the first new <br />homeowners (approximately 35 homes) would be in their homes in the <br />third quarter of '93. It would be over three years that people <br />would be moving into the homes. <br /> <br />Sisk: You were agreeable to a phasing <br /> plan? <br /> <br />Sheffield: Yes. We had proposed the two <br /> phases. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />One of the concepts that struck me <br />was the fact that you, as a <br />developer, were willing to go along <br />with a strict phasing plan that <br />could not otherwise be guaranteed, <br />unless we had this as part of the <br />Subdivision Agreement. I want there <br />to be no misunderstanding. <br /> <br />Wood: <br /> <br />The staff report for September 29, <br />1992, Planning Commission did <br />indicate a two phase scenario. <br />Phase 1 would consist of the <br />completion of 35 homes. The <br />completion of Phase 2 was not <br />anticipated prior to the '95-'96 <br />school year. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />I would want a numerical <br />distinction, as far as the lots and <br />the exact time table, to temporize <br />the outrageous situation in which we <br />find ourselves (overcrowding of <br />schools). <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />