Laserfiche WebLink
stated that it had been updated for current conditions and meets <br />their current standards. <br /> <br />Hornbostel wanted the access explained again. <br /> <br />Phare: <br /> <br />The proposal is to not address it in <br />the form of a PUD or Plat, to have <br />the Public Works Department analyze <br />it and make permanent <br />recommendations. We are requiring <br />construction access to use South <br />Boulder Road and, for the short <br />term, we shall allow unlimited <br />access in, provided it works safely <br />and adequately. At some point in <br />the future, as traffic volumes <br />continue to grow on South Boulder <br />Road, we will have to consider <br />limiting the access. The first <br />thing we would limit would be a left <br />turn out. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />My concern about the construction <br />traffic .... I would hope that it <br />wouldn't take long, that if there <br />was a problem, it would be addressed <br />right away. <br /> <br />Phare: <br /> <br />We would stay on top of it. We <br />monitor accident patterns and <br />history at all intersections with <br />arterial streets. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />Would there ever be a time where <br />they would consider putting a light <br />down there? <br /> <br />Phare: <br /> <br />I don't ever see a light at this <br />intersection. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />I don't remember on the first plan <br />where the phasing plan was in that. <br />Was it on the PUD? <br /> <br />Wood: <br /> <br />It was in a letter from the <br />applicant to the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />I would like to have those specifics <br />incorporated in, for me to support <br />this. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />