My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 12 14
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 9:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/14/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 12 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
focused on whether or not the Plat meets the City's subdivision <br />re¢~irements and applicable State law. <br /> <br />Davidson asked for Council to disclose any site visits or contacts <br />that they have had with persons in favor or opposed to the <br />subdivision that were not disclosed at a prior meeting. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I have spoken with Mr. Pitcher on <br />some general concerns that I had <br />about the subdivision. There have <br />been a variety of fairly brief <br />contacts with people on this matter. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />For the record, based upon those <br />contacts, do you feel that you could <br />still be impartial tonight in <br />deciding whether or not to approve <br />the subdivision, based upon the <br />evidence that will be presented to <br />you tonight? <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Yes, I do. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />I visited the site on Thanksgiving <br />day with my family and found the <br />sledding to be excellent. I, too, <br />have been contacted by people <br />discussing their general input as to <br />the sled hill prospect. None of <br />which has transpired would disallow <br />me from rendering a fair and <br />impartial decision. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />At every party that I've gone to, <br />we've had to have about a 1 1/2 hour <br />discussion about sled hill. Those <br />discussions were of the sort that <br />would not cause me to prejudice my <br />ability to vote impartially and <br />fairly on this matter. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />I have been there numerous times to <br />sled on the hill with my daughter. <br />I, too, have been contacted by other <br />people that have made comments about <br />it. I believe that I can make an <br />objective decision. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />I participated in the public meeting <br />at the Recreation Center and I've <br />also had some contacts. I don't <br />remember how many. I have been to <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.