My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 06 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2017 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 06 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:11 AM
Creation date
7/20/2017 1:33:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2017 06 08
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 11,2017 <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />process; it is more of a courtesy to obtain their comments. This is not an historic property or <br />historic building renovation or addition. <br />Rice says my observation of the parking situation is that the parking requirement for the new <br />building has been recalculated to be 13 spaces. Theoretically, this new development can <br />require 13 spaces to service it. When we make the exchange to go from 25 spaces to 38 <br />spaces, which is an additional 13 spaces, we really haven't gained any parking at all. <br />Dean says the parking in lieu does not guarantee or reserve parking spaces. <br />Rice says I think the reason we have the parking fee -in -lieu is it gives the City money to directly <br />invest in parking, and service the needs downtown. It appears to me that we haven't gained any <br />parking. <br />Aaron DeJong, Director of Economic Development, City of Louisville. <br />Today, we have 25 spaces. Through this development, we will have 38 spaces. We will get 13 <br />new spaces for Downtown which satisfies the requirement that this project will be paying into it. <br />Rice says in terms of this being some boon in terms of getting more parking downtown, I don't <br />think we are accomplishing that because we are also importing a new development that will add <br />to the parking load. <br />DeJong says yes, having a new building in Downtown will help with the vibrancy. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, 922-A Main Street, Louisville, CO <br />Ryan Costner, DAJ Design, 922-A Main Street, Louisville, CO <br />Eric Fowles, owner, Voltage, 901 Front Street, Louisville, CO/625 Fairfield Lane, Louisville, CO <br />Laura Steele, Voltage, 901 Front Street, Louisville, CO <br />Johnson presents from Power Point: I five in Town, I work in Old Town, and I've been in <br />the area for 20 years. I feel the gravity of what we are going to present. This is a unique project <br />and dynamic. We have an ad agency owner who is not a developer and who wants to create a <br />home for his home-grown business. He lives in Louisville. This is important to him and equally <br />about how he can grow his business and support business Downtown. We are familiar with the <br />site. Staff has done an excellent, thorough, and comprehensive job. We have a lot of regulatory <br />documents. This project highlights the complexity of all these documents and the need for <br />improvement in consolidation or clarifying it. We had a design for the original lot, not imaging <br />that a land swap was possible. A lot along Main Street made sense and a good move for <br />Louisville because it fills in the missing teeth. We have holes along Main Street. Main Street <br />hasn't developed and this is an opportunity to build it again. Having the parking lot in back <br />makes a lot of sense. We have tried to maximize the parking lot to show as much as we can. <br />We need room on Main Street to allow the building to function in a civic way, with more <br />pedestrian access and the ability to hang out in front. Restaurants are not planned for this <br />building. We pushed the building back 2.5'. We have an additional part on the south that pushes <br />back 1.5'. We designed 5' public access easements. We feel it is important that people not <br />access the parking from the alley because Main Street is where people want to go. We want to <br />create direct access around both sides of the building, losing the square footage but allowing a <br />better civic design. The Blue Parrot will develop in the future so having access to the side is <br />important to energize this part of Main Street. Thirteen parking spaces are required and are <br />non -designated. These are daytime spaces because this is a daytime business. These spaces <br />will likely become available at 5 pm. Louisville is busy in the evening. The 38 parking spaces are <br />good with 13 new spaces. The potential of what could happen in the future, how this building <br />has been planned, and how the land swap was positioned, structured parking is a good <br />possibility for the future. We are having discussions with the Blue Parrot about combining trash <br />enclosures. We have retail on the first level of Main Street and it correlates with the height of the <br />Blue Parrot. There are three retail spaces planned and discussed. The second floor upstairs is <br />office, set back, and less presence from the person scale on the street. With the pushed back <br />second level, we took the opportunity to do something unique. We took the middle core and <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.