My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2004 04 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2004 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2004 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:44 PM
Creation date
7/26/2005 2:29:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/20/2004
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2004 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 20, 2004 <br />Page 14 of 15 <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt voiced her belief the City should prepare a draft agreement in <br />response. She was not in favor of making a firm commitment on future projects, the 4% <br />administrative cost or the $250,000 contingency fee. <br /> <br />Council member Keany concurred with Council member Van Pelt's comments, but <br />voiced concern that Louisville may not have the funds for the project when CDOT gives <br />their approval to go forward. He stressed the importance for the Louisville Council to <br />make a commitment to the project. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light reviewed the original 1997 IGA, which stated the parties will <br />participate in a one-time reconstruction of the interchange. He reviewed earlier drafts of <br />the agreement, which had an acknowledgment that the one-time reconstruction meant two <br />components. <br /> <br />Council member Marsella stated she had no problem with the legitimate cost, but was <br />opposed to the inclusion of the Staff and Attorney's time. <br /> <br />There was discussion relative to the City of Louisville taking over the project, if the need <br />arose. Public Works Director Tom Phare was asked to comment on his department's <br />ability to take over the project. Phare stated it was within the Public Works Department's <br />ability to oversee the project, however, it would arrive at the peak season, when his Staff <br />is committed to various projects. <br /> <br />There was Council consensus to instruct Staff to meet and negotiate with the Town of <br />Superior Staff. <br /> <br />AWARD BID FOR PURCHASE OF NEW AND REPLACEMENT COMPUTERS <br /> TO DELL CORPORATION <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk noted the bid for the purchase of new and replacement computers was a <br />single company bid proposal. As several Council members voiced concern with the <br />single bid, Mayor Sisk suggested the matter be continued to the next Council meeting for <br />discussion. There was Council consensus. <br /> <br />MOTION: Mayor Sisk moved to continue the Award of the Bid for Purchase of New <br />and Replacement Computers to Dell Corporation to May 4, 2004. Council member <br />Levihn seconded the motion. All in favor. Council member Brown absent. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br /> <br />City Attorney Light reported on the Hoyle Litigation and asked coUncil for their <br />preference on how they wished to discuss the matter. He suggested the matter be <br /> <br />discussed either at a Work session or in executive session. There was Council consensus <br />to discuss this matter at a work session. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.