Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A: The Revenue Stability Problerri <br />The workgroup identified several problems wii:h the existing system contributing to revenue instability <br />and poor land use decisions, following are a just a few of these issues. <br />Colorado's Fiscal Structure <br />Colorado state fiscal policies play a major role in local governments' ability to make decisions <br />and meet the needs of their community. Colorado's tax structure allows for little flexibility on the part of <br />local governments to respond to changes within their community. Local governments in Colorado face <br />restrictions on revenue generation and expenditures and cannot raise taxes without taxpayer. In short, <br />Colorado's public finance structure incentivize:s municipalities to focus on economic and business <br />growth to support or expand services. <br />Revenue Instability <br />Communities with smaller budgets are sometimes unable to respond well to fluctuations in revenue <br />receipts. Minor fluctuations in sales tax revenues can have a profound impact on smaller budgets, <br />affecting the ability to provide services and further necessitating development for the sake of generating <br />sales tax revenue. However, the retail sector has many weaknesses as a reliable source of revenue over <br />time: competition, inflation, economic conditions, the aging of the population or other population <br />demographics, and variability in the business cycle, so dependence on this sector does not promote a <br />sustainable source of revenue. <br />Meanwhile, the costs of services are rising more quickly than are the revenues that support them, due <br />to rising fuel costs and inflation of materials, supplies, services, and labor costs. <br />Competition and Incentives <br />Competition for economic development is a natural and productive reality among neighboring <br />communities. However, when regional retail is introduced at the local level, competition often results in <br />cities and towns unnecessarily spending limited revenue to attract business development to their <br />community at the expense of community land use and transportation goals. While developers pit local <br />governments against one another, the amountt of resources necessary to secure the development <br />increases. In the end, there may be a temporary gain for one city in terms of revenue, but that gain will <br />be offset by lost revenue to incentives. <br />Regional retail is not always consistent with desirable land use development patterns or comprehensive <br />community planning. Most of the participants in the study stated that their communities did not need <br />more regional retail service. In some parts of Eloulder County, basic services such as grocery stores, dry <br />cleaners, and convenience stores are needed 1:o meet the demands of the community. However, for <br />most, the needs of their communities can be rnet by existing nearby retail outlets. Participants indicated <br />that they allowed for new regional retail, and even attracted it, because they need increased revenue, <br />not because there is a shortage of retail outlets. <br />The working group was not able to quantify the amount of money directed to incentives for regional <br />retail, but most participants indicated that incentives played a role in their efforts to draw regional retail <br />to their community. <br />