My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2008 08 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2008 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2008 08 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:26 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 4:22:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/19/2008
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2008 08 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 19, 2008 <br />Page 13 of 18 <br />Mr. Mundelein addressed the Planning Commission's disapproval of the project <br />as follows: <br />The Density of the Protect -The property is zoned for 15 units. The Planning <br />Department recommended 17 units and in response the density was reduced to <br />18 dwelling units. The purpose of this development is to create a functional <br />neighborhood that helps transition the City from high density commercial to <br />medium density residential. The 2005 City of Louisville Comprehensive Plan <br />suggests that medium density residential allow for up to 14.9 units per acre. The <br />proposal consists of 1.2 acres and therefore calculates out to 18 units. He <br />disagreed with the Planning Commission's concern it would set an undesirable <br />precedent by allowing a higher density on this property. He felt the transition <br />area has more in common with the adjacent commercial zoning than it does to <br />average residential neighborhood. <br />The Width of the Alley -The proposal includes expanding the alley to 20'. The <br />original proposal contained access from the development directly to County <br />Road through an existing curb cut in addition to the alley access. However <br />because the City has an existing policy of requiring all residential access to be <br />through the alley the County Road access was removed. The Fire Marshall has <br />reviewed this development plan and found the proposed 20' alley width is <br />sufficient for emergency access. <br />The Waiver Request for Roof Pitch -The design goal was to have steeper roof <br />pitches as viewed from the street but flat areas that are hidden from view. He <br />requested a reduction in the required percentage, of steep roof pitches not the <br />elimination of pitches themselves. <br />The City's Cost for the Development -The project is an infill property and will not <br />require the addition or extension of water, sewer, police, fire, roads, or schools. <br />He presented a fiscal impact statement, which summarized the net cost to the <br />City would be reduced by approximately $977 annually. One time revenues <br />including use tax, building permits, impact fees, and plan check fees would offset <br />these expenditures for approximately 21 years. The new development would <br />reduce the cost of these properties by $7,258 per year for about 21 years. <br />Additionally, more than 60% of building materials will be purchased locally. He <br />noted one of the benefits to the City is the elimination of the blighted trailer park. <br />Land Dedication Fee -The subject property became a part of the City in 1912, <br />conveyed private water main improvements and right-of-way over to the City in <br />1914. The property has beers a tax paying and contributing parcel since 1912. <br />Setback waiver request of 35': Reduces the setback from 25' to 10' along the <br />rear lot line in order to accommodate the side line for building number two. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.