My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 06 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 06 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 11:52:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/18/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 06 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6/18/84 Page -10- <br />So the trade-off, he thought the Council <br />has here is to make a determir~ation whether <br />we want to use that money to buy the reser- <br />voir land whenever, and however we have to <br />do it. Whether it be outright purchase, con- <br />demnation or whatever would be necessary to <br />get it. Therefore, the trade-off is do <br />we want to spend our money or get it free; <br />and at the same time essentially have our <br />omen space policy as in our comprehensive <br />p:Lan technically violated. To him that is <br />the issue we are looking at not necessarily <br />those of working out streets or pump stations. <br />One thing that is also important here is <br />that Council cannot take the money we save <br />for buying land for the reservoir and spend <br />ii: anywhere else but on the water system. <br />Wf~ could but we have policies that money <br />collected for building our water system up <br />or buying water rights is to be spent on <br />that. <br />Fo Farland, Representing Si~ated that he had been listening to the <br />the Heirs of the Property conversation and would clearly like to <br />si_ate what he felt were the benefits to <br />the City. One - as a taxpayer, he thought <br />that anytime you can avoid any tax dollars <br />to buy something that can be acquired without <br />having to spend the tax dollars is a definite <br />plus. He felt that one of the other examples <br />that needed to be recognized is that <br />total housing is available with the exception <br />of a few right now under construction or <br />planned for Louisville, which appears to be <br />smarter homes. This proposal presents an <br />opportunity for the City to get approximately <br />30 high income quality homes that will bring <br />the kind of people that need to be brought <br />into the community. The City has an in- <br />dustrial park, that is being developed and <br />the City is trying to attract people into <br />tYiat area and Louisville does not have the <br />housing to attract that category of manage- <br />mE~nt. When you start talking about $250,000 <br />to $400,000 homes, you are not also creating <br />an economic burden to the City. He felt <br />the pluses are, and they had gone to the <br />City of Boulder and he talked with Mr. Crain, <br />and the part-~of the land that they were look- <br />ing at as green space is included in this <br />1<rnd. Mr. Farland felt that the word ex- <br />change was important - the City would get <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.