My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 04 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 1:42:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/19/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 04 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4/19,/84 Page -4- <br />,.ouncilman Luce Councilman Luce suggested that a clause <br />Compelling Interest Clause be included in the annexation policy that <br />the burden is on the annexor to prove what <br />the compelling City interest in the annex- <br />ation would be, then Council will consider <br />it. <br />Time Frame Councilman Cussen suggested that the Resolu- <br />tion on the growth policy be for the term <br />of the Councilmembers. <br />Councilwoman Morris suggested that the Resolu- <br />tion be reviewed within a year and perhaps <br />a formal policy in the form of an Ordinance <br />be developed after an evaluation. She also <br />suggested that recreational facilities be <br />excluded in the annexation policy, i.e. <br />a tennis club, or movie theater - stick <br />strictly to residential growth. <br />City Attorney To Draw Up Mayor Meier directed the City Attorney to <br />Resolution draw up a resolution on the annexation policy <br />to include the merit clause and a time frame <br />of April 4, 1985. <br />.1TY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Administrator Wurl reported that he did <br />W-470 REPORT attend the County Commissioners meeting <br />and re-emphasized the earlier points that <br />we made in terms of Council's position on <br />W-470. The commissioners considered the <br />mai~ter and decided that it should be pre- <br />sented to the Consortium of Cities, which <br />is meeting in Longmont the first Wednesday <br />in May - May 2nd, and we will distribute <br />copies of the notice. <br />Councilwoman Morris Stated that all councilmembers had received <br />Questions to be Discussed a copy of a letter from Commissioner Heath <br />with very specific questions regarding our <br />position so that Councilman Leary or she <br />can give some idea on where we stand more <br />so than our motion. Some of the questions <br />to be addressed are - Whether or not we <br />wish to participate? If so, where and how? <br />What should the structure be of such a com- <br />mittee? Who should make the appointments <br />of the representatives? What corridors are <br />proposed? Who is going to fund it? Who <br />ha.s the authority to authorize it? What <br />i~, the role of the State Highway Commission? <br />What should the role be of DRCOG? What is <br />the jurisdiction of the Counties and Muni- <br />cipalities? What time frame we are looking at? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.