My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 03 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 03 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 12:05:38 AM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:18:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Supplemental fields
All Fields
Type:{EnerGovIndividualLicense} DocID:{0b2aea09-4a80-4b49-b252-77154af2da84} | IndividualLicenseBusinessPhone:{7203188392} | IndividualLicenseNumber:{LSVL-004925-2022} | IndividualLicenseContactIsBilling:{True} | IndividualLicenseExpirationDate:{12/18/2023 6:13:56 PM} | IndividualLicenseContactType:{Company} | IndividualLicenseClassification:{Master} | IndividualLicenseAppliedDate:{12/18/2022 6:13:55 PM} | IndividualLicenseHolder:{Smith, Gerald} | IndividualLicenseLicenseYear:{2022} | IndividualLicenseContactLastName:{Smith} | IndividualLicenseContactCompanyName:{Rocco's Electric} | IndividualLicenseContactFirstName:{Gerald} | IndividualLicenseDescription:{} | IndividualLicenseIssuedBy:{Administrator, System} | IndividualLicenseStatus:{Expired} | IndividualLicenseType:{Electrical Contractor} | IndividualLicenseIssuedDate:{12/18/2022 6:13:56 PM}
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3/7/84 Page -8- <br />Councilwoman Morris Commented although she felt 375 was an <br />arbitrary number, it was determined by Council <br />at that time it was one that could be ade- <br />quate handled impactwize. Right now felt <br />that Council needed to look at an overall <br />figure and work on our policy. The immediate <br />situation was with the "Other" category. <br />It was her feeling that all members of <br />Council did not having the same meaning <br />fo:r the category. For her it was for in- <br />dividuals building a single home within <br />the City - not to include multi-family; it <br />was not to be involved with a builder whether <br />it be 100 homes or 20 homes. Agreed that <br />the in-fill factor was a significant issue. <br />Suggested that perhaps the "Other" category <br />should be eliminated. Felt that Boulder's <br />plan has a lot of merit. In speaking with <br />developers they felt it was a very adequate <br />system when applied properly. She would <br />like to examine this as well as others and <br />put together a viable process for our City. <br />Also favored percentages rather than up to <br />numbers. <br />Councilwoman Johnson Commented that she agreed all members did <br />not have the same meaning for the "Other" <br />category. It was also her understanding <br />that one permit meant one unit. Also agreed <br />that multi-family should not be in this <br />category. Felt that the smaller builders <br />should be in that category. She would also <br />like to explore the idea or see if the in- <br />formation that was provided by staff con- <br />cerning the Homart development could be put <br />together and see if we are going to have <br />with our 375 figure whether they would be a <br />deficit or maybe room for 380. Wished to <br />have this information before Council starts <br />the process for a plan for an allotment <br />system. <br />Councilman Cussen Commented that part of the dilemma is that <br />Council inherited a problem consequently <br />Council is either faced with raising taxes <br />or decreasing the services available to the <br />residents of Louisville. Wished to stay <br />within the 350-375 range. With the category <br />"Other" felt this created a split council and <br />,~y did not give the thought and consideration <br />that Council should have.to this category. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.