My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:22 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/7/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2/7/84 Page -10- <br />Under the Density category A., Mr. Rupp <br />stated it had. been discussed 133 units <br />which would bring Parcel J's density down <br />to 5 units per acre and this was viewed on <br />a recent bus tour that councilmembers and <br />staff had taken through various develop- <br />ments in surrounding areas. Mr. Rupp stated <br />in addition t.o Density - D. it was discussed <br />that possibly a certain percentage of the <br />selling price of each unit would be required <br />as a part of the development to assure the <br />types of landscaping quality that the City <br />would like to see with any kind of development. <br />Adrninistrator Wurl showed a slide of the <br />Hornart plan and indicated that in the first <br />agreement the City had 80 acres dedicated <br />fo:r public use. When Homart changed their <br />plan it was Belt they cut this portion in <br />ha:Lf and utilized the west half . In fact <br />wh<~t happened was they had taken 2 portions <br />and the City was left with a 20 acre parcel, <br />which would riot be large enough to accomodate <br />the recreation site and the accompanying pole <br />people. Therefore, we must make clear that we <br />need this. Also, in the future a portion <br />of this site will have to be utilized for <br />drainage and that would be impacted if <br />Parcel J wou]_d develop. <br />Mayor Meier continued the public hearing and <br />asked for the applicant's presentation. <br />Mr. John Alshuler stated that he didri'1`, have' <br />anything at this time, perhaps would comment <br />after the puk~lic hearing. <br />Mayor Meier asked for public comments in <br />favor of the application. Then asked for <br />public comments for or against the appli- <br />cation. <br />AGAINST THE APPLICATION Debbie Singer, 1474 Kennedy Ave. stated <br />Debbie Singer that she appreciated the opportunity to <br />speak in favor of Council repealing the <br />882 acre Centennial Valley development plan <br />that was approved by the previous City Council. <br />She wished to frame her remarks in terms of <br />what residential development has done to <br />the livability of our community and what <br />the most recent development plan will do <br />to Louisville. Last year 581 homes were <br />built in Louisville. If one assumes that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).