Laserfiche WebLink
2/'7/84 <br />Page -9- <br />1986 - 100 units, 1987-1988 - 55 + incentive <br />allotment. 'There is a ceiling in the <br />agreement so that the developer would never <br />be: able to obtain more than 200 permits per <br />year. Attorney Rautenstraus also stated <br />there was a :possibility of an amendment to <br />th.e comprehensive plan if the agreement was <br />acceptable. <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Councilmembe:rs had been provided with copies <br />of Revenues :Per Housing Units, Expenditures <br />Per Housing rJnit, Revenue Sources, Sales <br />Tax, Ad Valorem Tax, Taxes Anticipated to <br />be Derived from Homart, Residential Assessed <br />Valuation, and a Summary. <br />Administrator Wurl stated that as part of <br />st'aff's review they were asked to consider <br />not only this development but overall develop- <br />ment in terms of residential. Slides of <br />the information were shown as Administrator <br />Wurl explained each item of the revenues .and <br />expenditures. .After the explanation, Ad- <br />ministrator Wurl stated the estimate planned <br />for Louisville is between 6,800 and 7,000 <br />units and is what the City would have ability <br />to serve utilities plus the other develop- <br />ment in the Comprehensive Planning area. <br />He remarked the City would not get to 10,000; <br />on the other hand that's a lot of develop- <br />ment to take place. However, could not pre- <br />dict when this would occur. <br />AREAS OF CONCERN Councilmembe:rs and people in the audience <br />had copies o:f the areas of concern regarding <br />the Homart rezoning plan. <br />Director of Community Development Rupp advised <br />these were derived from study sessions involved <br />with City Council and staff. The five areas <br />were the Phasing Plan, Parcel B, Parcel C, <br />Density, and Other Changes,, and Director <br />Rupp read and explained each category of <br />the concerns. He showed a slide that on <br />Parcel J the Public Service power lines <br />run down the east side of the residential <br />planning area which presents a physical <br />separation of 75' between the Heritage <br />subdivision and the Westfield townhouse <br />development. This is an existing buffer <br />situation and provides assurance for open <br />space between those developments. <br />