My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 01 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 01 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:22 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/17/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 01 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1/1'7/84 Page -8- <br />councilman Luce AskE~d what portion of the money that goes <br />to DRCOG goes as a percentage of the total? <br />Director Rupp advised it was his understanding <br />app:roximately half and the City keeps the <br />other half. <br />Mayor Meier closed the public hearing. <br />ADOPTION Councilman Cussen moved, Councilman Luce <br />seconded that Ordinance #818 - Model Elevator <br />Code be adopted. Roll call vote: <br />Cussen Yes <br />Leary Yes <br />Meier Yes <br />Luce Yes <br />Morris Yes <br />Johnson Yes <br />Woodson Yes <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />ORDINANCE #820 - EMISSION CONTROLS <br />AUTOMOBILE Councilmembers had a copy of the ordinance; <br />Attorney Rautenstraus read it by title only <br />on first reading; the request was for publi- <br />cation and if council so desired to set a <br />public hearing. <br />AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION Councilwoman Morris moved, Councilman Cussen <br />seconded that Ordinance #820 - Emmission <br />Controls - Automobile be published and a <br />public hearing set for February 21, 1984. <br />Councilman Leary stated that he would abstain <br />from voting on this matter since the organi- <br />zation he works for administers the program. <br />Councilman Luce commented that he was curious <br />as to the rationale of the stiffness of the <br />fir.~e - a maximum of $300.OG - what was the <br />justification for that? <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised that $300.00 <br />is the standard maximum that can be charged <br />for' a municipal code violation. This enables <br />discretion for the court, if a person was <br />found guilty of this, to set the fine in that <br />range as set in the ordinance. In the event <br />thE; Court saw fit they could fine somebody <br />up to $300.00 for a violation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.