Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville <br />[1.! <br />OLORADO SINCE 1878OLORADO - SINCE 1878 <br />FINANCE COMMITTEE <br />COMMUNICATION <br />SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />BUDGET AMENDMENT & PROCESS DISCUSSION <br />OCTOBER 16, 2017 <br />PRESENTED BY: KEVIN WATSON, FINANCE DEPARTMENT <br />SUMMARY: <br />Attached (Exhibit 1) is a preliminary 2017 Budget Amendment Worksheet for the next <br />budget amendment that will be presented to Council in November or December. <br />The Finance Committee has previously discussed the need for more budget amendments <br />throughout the year to better align the budget to the latest estimates of revenue and <br />expenditures. To this end, staff has included in the worksheet all changes, both increases <br />and decreases over $10,000, to the 2017 Capital Improvement Plan presented at the <br />August 8 Budget Retreat and September 26 Recommended Budget presentation. For <br />reference, attached (Exhibit 2) is the latest Capital Improvements Plan that will be <br />presented at the October 17 budget hearing. <br />Actually reducing some of the capital budgets to current estimates has caused some <br />concerns for project managers. Project managers are more hesitant to provide estimates <br />that are lower than the budget for fear of having their budgets actually reduced in a formal <br />budget amendment. In addition, there are legal issues related to awarding project <br />contracts that do not have a full multi-year appropriation in the year the contract is <br />awarded, regardless of the year, or years, in which the project will actually by expended. <br />Staff is currently working with the City Attorney to clarify the requirements of CRS 29-2- <br />110. <br />Therefore, staff is proposing to revert back to a method of capital financial management <br />used in the past, with some modifications due to the biennial budget process. Under this <br />proposal, staff would not propose to lower any capital budgets from project manager <br />estimates of "coming in under -budget". Instead, staff would manage the latest capital <br />expenditure projections using a current year estimate field, as shown in Exhibit 2 under <br />2017 Estimate column. These estimated amounts are currently used by staff to project <br />ending fund balances. <br />The advantages of this proposal is that the budget for the capital projects are only reduced <br />for known under -budget conditions or special circumstances. Project managers will be <br />free to estimate under -budget projects without fear of losing their legal appropriations. <br />This will also allow contracts to be awarded at the end of one year for work to be <br />performed in another year. Finally, this is a method used in the past, which project <br />managers are comfortable with. <br />FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMUNICATION <br />16 <br />