Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />BUDGET AMENDMENT & PROCESS DISCUSSION <br />OCTOBER 16, 2017 <br />PAGE2OF2 <br />The obvious disadvantage is that the current year budget ceases to be a relevant financial <br />projection tool once the next year's budget process starts. <br />This proposal also extends to the 2018 Recommended Budget. Staff proposes that if a <br />project is known to extend to a year beyond its appropriation, and that knowledge occurs <br />during the next year's budget process, the "carry -forward" adjustment will be included in <br />the next year's budget at the time of initial adoption. <br />For example, note the Miner's Field Park Improvement Project in Exhibit 2 (page one, line <br />seven). The 2017 Budget is $35,000. However, staff is confident that not more than <br />$25,000 will be spent on the project during 2017, but the total project estimate is still <br />$35,000, with $10,000 estimated to be spent in 2018. Under this proposal, the current <br />year budget of $35,000 will not be reduced. Instead, the new estimate of $25,000 will be <br />reflected in the 2017 Estimate column, which will adjust the estimated Open Space & <br />Parks Fund balance at December 31, 2017. In addition, the $10,000 will be included in <br />the initial 2018 Budget, which prevents the need for a "carry -forward" amendment next <br />Spring. <br />The final attachment (Exhibit 3) is an adjusted 2017 Budget Amendment Worksheet <br />assuming implementation of staff's proposal. Note that the only capital projects proposed <br />for a budget reduction are the two Wayfinding projects, which have been eliminated to <br />help fund the Recreation Center project shortfall. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />17 <br />