Laserfiche WebLink
4) Prioritization. To prioritize the recommendations, each was measured by the following factors: stakeholders, time required to implement the <br />strategy, funding expectations, and importance relative to Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The following weights were assigned and applied in order <br />to give a final prioritization score on a scale of 0 (low) —12 (high): <br />Funding <br />Scale: 1 (least availability of funding) through 5 (highest availability of funding) <br />1= Requires additional budget <br />+3 = Likely to find all or partial funds (i.e. through grants) <br />5 = Within current budget <br />A strategy may receive up to 5 points for Funding. <br />Estimated Timeframe for Completion <br />Scale: 1 (longest amount of time) through 4 (shortest amount of time) / Ongoing = +1 <br />1 = 24 months+ <br />2 = <24 months <br />3 = <18 months <br />4 = <6 months <br />+1 = Ongoing <br />A strategy may receive up to 5 points for Timeframe. <br />Environmental Importance relative to effect on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions <br />This is a multiplier to give a strategy extra prioritization based on the importance factor of whether or not it will affect environmental <br />factors. This could include GHG emissions, air quality, water quality, or soil quality. <br />1.0 = Does not improve environmental factors <br />1.1 = Improves environmental factors with significant effort <br />1.2 = Improves environmental factors with low effort <br />Prioritization Score <br />The total prioritization score is determined by the following formula: <br />DRAFT 6 <br />8 <br />