My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2017 10 24
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2017 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2017 10 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:56:19 AM
Creation date
10/30/2017 11:06:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2017 10 24
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Funding Score + Timeframe Score) x Environmental Importance Factor = Prioritization Score <br />This framework method was presented to the Interim City Manager, the Assistant to the City Manager, and the Louisville Sustainability Advisory <br />Board and approved in advance of its application to the recommendations. <br />It should be noted that this framework should not be considered the final prioritization designator, as there may be strategies which receive a <br />lower prioritization score than stakeholders desire, but remain a priority. In these cases, stakeholders have flexibility to add/delete priorities based <br />on other factors. This framework should only be used as a tool to help in the prioritization of projects into this 2 -Year Work Plan. <br />It is also important to note that prioritization refers to how easily (funding resources) and quickly (near or long-term) a recommendation may be <br />accomplished, rather than to the importance of the recommendation itself. <br />The framework matrix was populated with the data based on research and input received from the stakeholders of these strategies, and <br />prioritization scores were tallied. <br />5) Prioritized Recommendations. Recommendations were compiled in order of timeframe, funding and environmental impact, and are provided <br />with the detailed scoring in the section called List of Action Recommendations by Priority. <br />DRAFT 7 <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.