My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 07 25
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2017 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 07 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2025 2:15:47 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 11:49:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
Paper copy disposed of on November 26 2025
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2017 07 25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />July 25, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Council member Stolzmann appreciated they took public feedback and tried to <br />incorporate them. She agrees with Council member Loo about birds nesting. She <br />asked why can't the design can't include a zero entry on a new building. Roybal <br />said the Jacoe building has 21 inches of height (3 steps) which necessitates a <br />ramping system. He continued that the Jacoe store and new building do not have <br />to have the same level on the first floor, but if they did not they would not be <br />connected. ADA was strong desire. Roybal said it would be hard to have one <br />staff member monitor Jacoe and the new building The new building can be a <br />different level but continuity would be lost. The desire was to have the buildings <br />contiguous. Council member Stolzmann has gotten a lot of comments about lack <br />of door on Main St. She would like serious consideration to door on Main St. . <br />Roof pitch was discussed. Other feedback: if different building style, perhaps not <br />have it lined up with other buildings; perhaps set it back. Council member <br />Stolzmann also asked that the sign be painted on the building instead of a <br />marquee sign. <br />Council member Lipton believes it is an efficiently designed building. If it were <br />private, he does not know that Council would be accepting of it. He shares <br />Council member Stolzmann concern about the sign. <br />Library Director Barrett agrees there will be limited staffing and has security <br />concerns. The design has good line of sight to the Jacoe from the new building. <br />Tammy Lastoka is on the Library Foundation. She agrees with storage issue and <br />advocates for more storage. She likes scheme 4. Wants to keep the old school <br />look but it is more important to her to have a place where things can be <br />showcased. <br />Deb Fahey agrees about storage and entry should be on Main St. She believes <br />the sign should clarify if it is mainly a museum or visitor center. <br />Adjourn to Special Meeting 7:57 pm <br />Submitted by— Dawn Burgess <br />July 26, 2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.