My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 07 25
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2017 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 07 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:56:38 AM
Creation date
10/30/2017 11:49:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2017 07 25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />July 25, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Council member Stolzmann appreciated they took public feedback and tried to <br />incorporate them. She agrees with Council member Loo about birds nesting. She <br />asked why can't the design can't include a zero entry on a new building. Roybal <br />said the Jacoe building has 21 inches of height (3 steps) which necessitates a <br />ramping system. He continued that the Jacoe store and new building do not have <br />to have the same level on the first floor, but if they did not they would not be <br />connected. ADA was strong desire. Roybal said it would be hard to have one <br />staff member monitor Jacoe and the new building The new building can be a <br />different level but continuity would be lost. The desire was to have the buildings <br />contiguous. Council member Stolzmann has gotten a lot of comments about lack <br />of door on Main St. She would like serious consideration to door on Main St. . <br />Roof pitch was discussed. Other feedback: if different building style, perhaps not <br />have it lined up with other buildings; perhaps set it back. Council member <br />Stolzmann also asked that the sign be painted on the building instead of a <br />marquee sign. <br />Council member Lipton believes it is an efficiently designed building. If it were <br />private, he does not know that Council would be accepting of it. He shares <br />Council member Stolzmann concern about the sign. <br />Library Director Barrett agrees there will be limited staffing and has security <br />concerns. The design has good line of sight to the Jacoe from the new building. <br />Tammy Lastoka is on the Library Foundation. She agrees with storage issue and <br />advocates for more storage. She likes scheme 4. Wants to keep the old school <br />look but it is more important to her to have a place where things can be <br />showcased. <br />Deb Fahey agrees about storage and entry should be on Main St. She believes <br />the sign should clarify if it is mainly a museum or visitor center. <br />Adjourn to Special Meeting 7:57 pm <br />Submitted by— Dawn Burgess <br />July 26, 2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.