My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 11 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2017 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 11 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:28 AM
Creation date
11/13/2017 11:20:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2017 11 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 3 pages <br />To accommodate the required square footage for the project, the majority of the <br />mass of the building is located 50 feet back from the sidewalk, allowing a one and <br />two story facade at the street. Of particular importance to this project is the <br />proximity to the historic building to the south, currently housing the Huckleberry <br />Restaurant, formerly Louisville's bank at the turn of the last century. To respect this <br />one-story historic structure, the southern half of the Main Street facade is designed <br />at one-story, actually lower than the historic parapet. <br />The building facade at Main Street is envisioned as a composition of three parts: a <br />pair of 2 -story storefront facades, patterned after typical western false front buildings <br />in scale and pattern; and a low, one-story retail storefront replacing the mid-century <br />modern building in that location, with similar form and simple detail. The three <br />storefronts divide the 95 feet of facade into modules that were historically used and <br />that are prevalent today in Downtown. The rhythm of the buildings on the east side <br />of the 700 block cycles from one story to two story, with alternating horizontal and <br />vertical emphasis, with paired buildings such as the Singing Cook/Book Cellar, and <br />Huckleberry buildings. These varying elements form the context for the new <br />building at 712/722 Main. As the buildings being replaced are mid-century, it is <br />appropriate to take cues from the simple, straight -lined architecture of that era. <br />The materials for the Main Street facade are primarily wood and metal. A natural <br />IPE hardwood siding is proposed for the major elements at pedestrian level, with a <br />combination of black anodized and wood storefront detailing. Natural finish metals <br />such as patina copper and dark mill finish steel provide accents. Storefront <br />windows are generous to promote commerce and provide interest at the pedestrian <br />level. The southern half of the facade retains a significant setback from the property <br />line, similar to the existing condition. This allows for outdoor seating, sheltered by <br />an overhang, extending the season beyond that of the temporary patios. This relief <br />from the street begins with a smaller area of setback at the northern part of the <br />facade, then a minimum of 36" additional sidewalk width is maintained to a <br />maximum of 7.5 feet at the southern end. <br />The third story is set back 50 feet from the front of the property to minimize it's <br />impact when viewed from Main Street. This is the design standard specified in the <br />Downtown Design Handbook and Framework Plan. The Framework Plan states "In <br />general, no more than 50 percent of the building footprint should be a third story". <br />Although the building does not fill the entire footprint, based on the allowable <br />building footprint, the proposed third story is 55% of the building footprint. We feel <br />that this is justifiable based on the fact that the second floor is also set back 50' on <br />the south side to respect the historic property to the south. If the second story was <br />built out to the lot line in front, this suggestion of Tess than 50% would be met, as <br />well as providing the suggested alley setback of the third level. However we felt that <br />it was more important to provide a significant setback to the historic property. These <br />items are not specific codes or standards, but they are guidelines. <br />Waiver Request <br />Where a 20' rear setback at the alley is required, and provided for the majority of the <br />building mass, we are requesting to project a stair tower and balconies into the <br />setback to break down the scale and mass of the building, instead of providing a <br />monolithic rear wall. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.