Laserfiche WebLink
It should be noted that this framework should not be considered the final prioritization designator, as there may be strategies which receive a <br />lower prioritization score than stakeholders desire, but remain a priority. In these cases, stakeholders have flexibility to add/delete priorities based <br />on other factors. This framework should only be used as a tool to help in the prioritization of projects into this 2 -Year Work Plan. <br />Prioritization refers to ho <br />The framework matrix was populated with the data based on research and input received from the stakeholders of these strategies, and <br />prioritization scores were tallied. <br />5) Prioritized Recommendations. Recommendations were compiled in order of timeframe, funding liFKPI alignment, and are provided with the <br />detailed scoring in the section called List of Action Recommendations by Priority, located in Appendix A. Notes on progress since the publication of <br />e ®' us a na.i i y c ion an an npu rom rn eviews an researc are in e seon ca ed Detailed Progress and Recommendations, <br />located in Appendix B. A summary of recommendations is provided in the next section, divided into recommendations for City Council, and <br />recommendations for general City operations, under the authority of the City Manager <br />DRAFT 8 <br />