Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 6, 2017 <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />Bill Hayes,1062 Delaware, Denver with Signdealz, Greg Maring — 537 Augusta Lane, <br />Louisville and Mark Oberholzer, 224 Hoover Avenue owners of the property at 640 Main <br />Street, introduced themselves to Council. <br />Bill Hayes stated the plan is to refurbish the existing building while respecting the past <br />Restoration of the sign would include using some elements from the1950s with exposed <br />neon and channel lettering. He showed a rendenng along with examples of the <br />company's previous work. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if it costs more to refurbish or to make a new sign. Mr. <br />Hayes stated it is significantly more to make a new one; in the $30-40 thousand range. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if the refurbished sign will be brighter Mr. Hayes stated <br />that will be the same. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if the new sign will be parallel to Main Street or at 45 <br />degree angle. It will be the same, at the current 45 degree angle. <br />Public comments <br />Gregory Burrell, 740 Copper Lane, stated the proposal undermines the original <br />workmanship of the sign It retains original materials, but all contributing design features <br />will be gone The proposal also wipes out the connection to the Colacci Family and the <br />Italian heritage. <br />Greg Maring noted that as owners of the property, they think the sign shape and <br />configuration is iconic to town. They realize it is an important piece of the town's <br />landscape. They want to respect the history of the building, but can't retain the sign in <br />its current configuration. The owners feel it is important the sign remains on the building <br />Deb Fahey stated the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) voted to landmark and <br />give the grant money Much of their decision was based on the similar procedure for old <br />gas station sign on Front and Pine. She said, speaking personally, she feels it maintains <br />its historic location, shape, colors and is enough like the sign at Front and Pine to <br />warrant landmarking. <br />Councilmember Leh asked if the sign at the Empire was Iandmarked Director Zuccaro <br />stated it is not <br />Councilmember Loo agreed removing the Blue Parrot name loses the history of the <br />sign. The parrot is the iconic part of the sign. The new sign doesn't resonate like the <br />parrot does She recognized it is impossible to replace, but if redone the sign loses all <br />of the historic design. In order to preserve what is there now we may need to spend <br />HPF money to purchase the sign outright to store it or reuse it She didn't support the <br />proposal as presented <br />