Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 6, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 17 <br />Councilmember Keany stated there is nostalgia with the Blue Parrot sign and he was <br />disappointed to see it change but recognizes the new owners and new use of the <br />building He noted the Empire sign retained its style and shape. He supports the <br />recommendation of the HPC but prefers a more stylized historic looking sign than what <br />is presented He wondered if the face is replaced, could it be donated to the museum. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if the owners want to preserve the sign. Mr. Oberholzer <br />stated as new owners of the building, they don't have the rights to the name, so they <br />can't continue to use the sign. He noted if they can save the face, they would be happy <br />to donate it. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated if what is wanted is to have a neon sign at that <br />corner, then it needs to be designated historic to save the shape, size and neon. There <br />is value to designating it as historic if we want to keep it. <br />Councilmember Leh felt this was a hard decision. He reviewed the architectural and <br />social significance criteria as presented in the packet. Council is bound by those criteria <br />so we need to review carefully. He deeply appreciates the effort to maintain some of the <br />look and feel of the sign at that corner and its significance to the city He found it difficult <br />to see how it met either the architectural or social cntena. Reluctantly he will vote no. <br />Mike Deborski, 601 Pine Street, said he struggles with funding the stripping away of the <br />heritage of Louisville and felt maintaining the core of the sign is not enough He had <br />offered to buy the sign and store it and felt the City shouldn't subsidize the stripping of <br />our heritage. He thought the proposal was taking away the essence of what the sign is <br />and the heritage it represents. <br />Greg Manng noted many have offered to buy this sign. He realizes they are limited to <br />having to save the shape, size, and color If they as owners could put in a new sign with <br />the same character they are happy to have that conversation. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if there was a way to allow a new sign that mimics the old <br />sign Director Zuccaro said there are two options in the code; landmarking and iconic <br />signs Current regulations contemplate reuse of existing signs He said a possible <br />option would be to apply for a vanance which has not been evaluated. <br />Councilmember Keany asked the applicants if it would be possible to continue the item <br />to allow time to find alternatives <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated Councilmember Leh convinced her it doesn't meet <br />the criteria of an histonc sign. <br />