City Council Minutes 2004 10 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting October 19, 2004 Page 9 of 15 · The licensee can't allow patrons to leave the premises with unconsumed samples. · The licensee faces the same revocation, suspension and enforcement provisions as otherwise apply to the license. The proposed ordinance follows the state limitations and adds the following local stipulations: 1) Licensees must apply for a permit to conduct the tastings. 2) The applicant must provide notice to the Louisville Police Department of the tasting event at least two weeks in advance. 3) The applicant shall provide notice of a cancellation 24 hours in advance. Many surrounding communities have or are in the process of adopting similar ordinances. The Local Licensing Authority recommends Council approval of Ordinance No. 1457, Series 2004. Mayor Sisk opened the public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against Ordinance No. 1457, Series 2004. PUBLIC COMMENT Mike Koertje, Liquor Authority Chairperson, stated the Authority has discussed this ordinance, met with local licensees and members of the Louisville Police Department. The licensees believe there are advantages to having this ordinance in place. He noted the City of Broomfield's ordinance served as a model for this ordinance, and the Town of Superior, the Cities of Lafayette, and Boulder have all passed such ordinances. He stated the Local Licensing Authority urges the Council to adopt this ordinance. Mayor Sisk asked Police Chief Bruce Goodman to comment on the ordinance. Chief Goodman stated the police department has no issues with the ordinance. It follows the provisions of the state statutes. He voiced his support of the additional restrictions at the local level. Drew Owen, 324 S. McCaslin Blvd, Louisville, CO stated he represents Centennial Wine & Spirits. He voiced his support of the ordinance, and explained in these economic times such incentive could enhance their business. He requested an exception to the two-week notice on the tastings. coUNcIL COMMENT Council member Van Pelt asked for the clarification on the two-week notice on a tasting. Mr. Koertje stated through discussions with the police department, it was decided that the police might require two-weeks notice to review the staffing needs for a tasting. Council member Van Pelt asked if Louisville had any liquor licensed drug stores. She questioned whether that should be a part of the ordinance. There was confirmation that Louisville does not have any liquor licensed drug stores.