My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 11 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 11 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:27 PM
Creation date
12/14/2017 1:49:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B5
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 11 28
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 6, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 17 <br />retail square footage to approximately 3,000 square feet. Total permit and tax revenues <br />from the redevelopment project over 2 years are estimated to be $170,000 and rebate <br />payments are $60,000. <br />Mayor Muckle asked how long the location has been empty. Director DeJong stated at <br />least six years. <br />Grant Hopfenspirger introduced himself and noted he has been manager of Outback in <br />Louisville for a number of years. He said it is expensive to do a startup restaurant and <br />would appreciate any assistance from the City. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated we normally deduct existing space out of the <br />incentive package, she stated this package does not introduce new jobs above the <br />median wage. She noted incentivizing this restaurant may hurt existing restaurants and <br />we aren't helping other new restaurants. She felt this was not appropriate to do that <br />when other restaurants are not getting incentives. She plans to vote against this tonight. <br />Councilmember Loo stated Council did do a BAP for existing building renovation for <br />Waterloo when they first came in; this was a wonderful use of our money. We have <br />been saying we don't incentivize new restaurants on Main Street, but this particular <br />location has been vacant for a long time. This is an appropriate use of the money and <br />she plans to support this. <br />Councilmember Keany also will support this. The space has been vacant for a long time <br />and making this into a restaurant is a large amount of money. Funding for the BAP is <br />from the business, if it underperforms they won't get rebates in the package. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked for a description of the math. Director DeJong stated <br />the applicant believes new sales would be $2 Million per year and two years of that <br />would result in 40% of the City's sales tax which yields about $58,000 per year. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he agreed with Councilmember Stolzmann and doesn't <br />believe we have done many of these for business such as this. It seems inconsistent <br />with other packages the City has offered. If this case needs incentives, the property <br />owner should be providing them. He won't support this tonight. <br />Councilmember Leh stated we should compare economic incentives and is this similarly <br />situated to others. However, this property has been vacant a long time and from that <br />stand point this is different from other locations in town. He felt comfortable supporting <br />this one, but wanted to watch this carefully. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated it has been vacant so long the property owner should be <br />incentivizing this; the City should not be financing this. <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.