Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 7, 2004 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />Recreation and Senior Service Director Keith Williams reported the 2005 Capital <br />Improvement Budget has $120,000 direction toward lighting the tennis courts at Monarch <br />High School, and any other improvements such as resurfacing, wind screens and netting. <br />Although preliminary discussions indicated a financial sharing of resurfacing, wind <br />screens and new netting of the tennis courts, school district officials have reported no <br />direct funds will be available towards the tennis court improvement project. However, <br />indirect support of the project would occur by the school district by managing the project <br />with support from City Staff. Although $120,000 was budgeted towards the lighting of <br />the tennis courts, it is hoped that budgeted funds through competitive bidding of the <br />project can assist in the resurfacing, wind screens and new netting of the courts. He <br />reviewed the Intergovernmental Agreement with Boulder Valley School District for joint <br />facility use by City programs and capital improvements to the Monarch High School <br />Tennis Courts. Additionally, an estimated timeline of the completion of the project was <br />reviewed. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> <br />Rob Scott, 946 Arapahoe Circle, Louisville, CO thanked Council for participating in the <br />Monarch High School Tennis Courts Project. He stated his desire to have the courts <br />resurfaced and noted there are matching grants available through the United States Tennis <br />Association. He offered his professional services to assist in this project. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt inquired about Section 2 of the agreement, which addresses the <br />City use of the tennis courts for scheduled programs without charge. She asked if other <br />organizations would be able to use the courts without charge. Williams stated no. <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt noted the initial terms of the agreement stipulate a ten-year <br />period, and asked whether the City's initial investment would be repaid after the ten-year <br />period. She voiced her concern over the agreement designating the City responsible for <br />paying the utilities for the tennis courts. She stressed the school would also be using the <br />lighting for school programs and should share in the payment of the utilities. <br /> <br />Council member Keany also had concerns relative to Section 2 of the agreement. He <br />addressed the lighting and asked that timers be installed. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk suggested if the agreement is to be terminated after ten-years, it should be <br />based on a good cause, and at that point, the City would be repaid. He noted the City is <br />really the contributor in this project, and asked Recreation and Senior Service Director <br />Williams to continue discussions with the school district on the IGA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 55, SERIES 2004 - A RESOLUTION LIFTING PREVIOUS <br />RESTRICTIONS DESIGNATING PART OF THE FUND BALANCE OF THE <br />CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR FUTURE DEBT REDUCTION <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />