Laserfiche WebLink
I 1.2 City,] <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO , SINCE 1878 <br />PARKS & PUBLIC LANDSCAPE ADVISORY <br />BOARD COMMUNICATION <br />AGENDA ITEM <br />SUBJECT: <br />UPDATE ON DECLINING COTTONWOOD TREES BY THE <br />POWERLINE TRAIL AND RECREATION SENIOR CENTER <br />DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2018 <br />PRESENTED BY: JOE STEVENS, PARKS AND RECREATION <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Previously the Parks and Public Landscape Advisory Board (PPLAB), on a 4-2 vote, <br />recommended that the two cottonwood trees by the recreation senior center and on the <br />Powerline Trail not be removed but that the fall zone be fenced to discourage activity <br />within the hazard zone along with relocation of that section of the Powerline Trail. Since <br />that recommendation was made, staff asked the City's insurer to review PPLAB's <br />recommendation. Our insurer was not supportive of leaving the trees "if they pose a <br />liability to the city and dangerous situation to residents and non-residents that happen to <br />be in the area" and asked for a second opinion. Based on that information, the City <br />contacted Kevin Marks, a Board Certified Master Arborist, to evaluate and make a <br />recommendation on the condition of the trees. In essence, conclusions are consistent <br />with the City Forester's: "All things considered, public safety is the priority. If the trees <br />are removed any possibility of injury will be mediated". Based on the 2nd opinion and our <br />insurer's concerns around liability, we have temporarily fenced and signed the area <br />around the trees and are requesting PPLAB revisit this subject. <br />At the December 13, 2017 Open Space Advisory Board (OSAB) meeting, OSAB <br />discussed but did not take formal action with regards to the aging cottonwood trees, but <br />did share concerns with regards to any action that would require realignment of the <br />Powerline Trail (minutes from OSAB's December 13,2017 meeting pertaining to this <br />issue are attached) for PPLAB review. <br />Attached to this communication please find the report prepared by Kevin Marks, Board <br />Certified Master Arborist. That report recommends removal of both trees for public <br />safety. If the trees remain, substantial steps must be taken to prevent the public from <br />entering the area under the trees. The City's insurance provider is not amenable to post <br />and dowel/split rail fencing and is of the view that the trees pose a hazard and removal <br />is warranted. <br />The January 15, 2018 report states that one of the trees has been heavily impacted by <br />construction activities. Saunders Construction has acknowledged that one of their <br />subcontractors did not follow the trees and protection plans and specifications as <br />enumerated in section 320190.33 of the City's bid package #2 dated September 29, <br />2017. Per that agreement, the City Forester assessed the damage and directed the <br />contractor to take immediate steps to remediate some of the damage and impacts from <br />this intrusion. Saunders acknowledged that these actions were not approved, <br />4 <br />