My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 02 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 02 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 10:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 02 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 20, 2018 <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />Councilmember Maloney asked Councilmember Stolzmann which criteria she was <br />concerned about. Councilmember Stolzmann stated this is not a landmark sign or <br />iconic, rather a new sign so it does not meet the downtown sign manual criteria. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the downtown sign manual has certain criteria, including the <br />ability to apply for a PUD for a waiver but it then references the same critena. It is a <br />circular process but it seems there was intent for waiver criteria but it was not <br />completed. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he appreciates Councilmember Stolzmann close reading of <br />the rules, but noted as the sign code is written it is circular and should be interpreted as <br />staff has done. <br />Attorney Light noted the Downtown Sign Manual sets up the possibility of a waiver but <br />then doesn't give an option for the waiver in the PUD process; there is an inherent <br />conflict in the code Council has the option to interpret the rules <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she feels it is arbitrary to not apply the criteria She <br />does not feel the PUD meets the cntena <br />Mayor Muckle stated it appears clear the intent was to allow waivers <br />Attorney Light stated Council may adopt the resolution upon a finding that with respect <br />to the conflicting language in the downtown sign manual it was the intent to allow for <br />requests for increases in height, area, and number of signs and therefore it is not <br />absolutely required a sign meet those specific standards with respect to this application. <br />Roll call vote: Motion passed 5 — 2; no votes from Mayor Pro Tem Lipton and <br />Councilmember Stolzmann. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 12, SERIES 2018 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL <br />REVIEW USE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROOF MOUNTED CMRS <br />FACILITY FOR PROPERTY AT 363 CENTENNIAL PARKWAY <br />Planner Ritchie stated this is a request for a Special Review Use (SRU) to allow the <br />construction of a rooftop wireless Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) facility at <br />363 Centennial Parkway. The request is for a new roof mounted wireless facility with a <br />12 -panel antenna and associated equipment This requires a Special Review Use as it <br />exceeds the maximum height allowed in the PCZD — C Zone District — 42 feet to top of <br />roof -top mechanical screening They are proposing a 52'-8" antenna that exceeds the 6 - <br />foot limit for panel antennas above the parapet. They are not exceeding the height of <br />the roof top screening. <br />Staff finds the application complies with the requirements, excepting overall height and <br />the height of the panel antenna above the parapet Staff also finds compliance with Sec <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.